The Post-Crescent Highlists Business's Dependence on Investment in Infrastructure
Post-Crescent on
July 5, 2013 featured an article
about an effort by Congressmen Petri and Ribble to preserve the current
weight limits for trucks on U. S. Highway 41 when it is converted to Interstate
41. Today, trucks weighing up to 97,000 lbs. can use Highway 41, but the rules
for interstate highways place a limit of 80,000 lbs. on trucks. Mr. Ribble and
Mr. Petri are campaigning to grandfather in the old weight limit when the
highway becomes an interstate.
Radical Rightist Republicans Are Wrong to Want to Minimize Government Investment
The advantages and disadvantages of the congressmen’s
proposal are obvious, and I will not argue one side or the other. What I will
point out is that the whole discussion highlights business’s dependence on
government’s investment in infrastructure. Radical rightists in the Republican
Party like to say that government spending is mostly wasted and that it should
be minimized in order to make the money available for private investment. They say
that government investment “crowds out” private investment because every dollar
invested by government is a dollar that is not available for private
investment, but the example of Highway 41 shows that government investment in
infrastructure can actually promote private investment. The Post-Crescent quotes the manager of the
conversion project as saying,
What it means for the state of
Wisconsin is the opportunities for increased economic development along the corridor
…. There’s some national operations that won’t consider locating on a highway
if it’s not an interstate.
Government Investment and Business Investment Are Complementary
Government investment and business investment are not in
competition with one another. They complement one another. Without private
investment to develop the economy, government could not operate because the
private economy generates the taxes that government needs. On the other hand,
without government investment in infrastructure, business could not operate
because businesses depend on the infrastructure to get their products to market
and to obtain their inventories of raw materials and finished goods. Modern businesses also need government
investment in other areas. For example, they need an educated work force. So,
they depend on government investments in education. Law-enforcement and fire
protection are other examples.
Radical Rightists Create Inefficiency in Government
Because of the interdependence between business and
government, we all want both of them to do their jobs efficiently, but
unfortunately, the radical rightists in the Republican Party are making both of
them less efficient than they should be. The radical rightists insist that government
investment should be minimized. They oppose practically all proposals for
public investment, and their opposition has become a drag on the efficient
operation of governments at all levels. Because of Republican opposition,
useful investments of many kinds of slowed down and even stopped. Republican
intransigence creates uncertainty in funding, and as a result, our governments
are much less efficient than they might be. Many important investments in infrastructure,
education and other areas are not made, and our economy suffers as a result.
Radical Rightists Create Inefficiency in Business, Too
The uncertainty created by the radical rightist also reduces
the efficiency of businesses. They delay making investments because in a
climate of uncertainty, it is hard to know what the costs and benefits of an
investment will be. Large companies are sitting on huge piles of cash that
could be invested to grow their profits, to create jobs and to grow our
economy, but the uncertainty created by the intransigence of the radical is
preventing them from making such investments.
We Must Distinguish Between Investment and Other Spending
We need to find a way to bypass the intransigence of the
radical right. To do so, we need to do two things. First, in our public
discussions, we need to distinguish between “investments” and other spending.
An investment is an expenditure that is expected to bring a return that is
greater than its cost. Expenditures in
areas like transportation infrastructure and education are investments. They stimulate
the economy by improving transportation or by improving the work force. That does not mean that every investment
turns out well. Some investments will fail to produce the expected results.
This is true for business investment just as it is for government investment. Businesses
sometimes make investments that don’t pan out, and so do governments.
Investments are inherently risky because we cannot really know the future, but
we have to exercise our best judgment, and we have to take the risks that
investments bring in both the private and the public sectors. Cutting back on
public investment in order to minimize the size of governments is a recipe for
economic decline.
We Must Defeat the Radical Rightists at the Polls
The second thing we need to do in order to bypass the
intransigence of the radical rightists is to defeat them at the polls. If you are a Republican, work to elect
moderate Republicans to office. If you are a Democrat, work to elect Democrats
to office. Until we do these things, the radical rightists in the Republican
Party will continue to create fiscal uncertainty and will continue to make both
our governments and our businesses less effective and less efficient than they
should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment