Monday, February 24, 2020

How to Deal with Accusations of “Socialism”


Don't be Trapped into Discussing Socialism

The radical right loves to accuse American leftists of being socialists and their policy ideas of being “socialism,” and the radical rightists add, as the OTWH did in his latest State of the Union speech, that America will never be a socialist. This accusation reveals the emptiness of radical rightist thinking. They can find no substantive reason for opposing the things that the left is proposing. So, they resort to name-calling.

The accusation has the additional advantage, from the rightists’ point of view, that it draws unwary leftists into an argument over socialism. They end up defending socialism instead of defending their policy proposals. This is a huge mistake. It is a trap, and leftists should not fall into it.

Promote Policies on the Basis of Widely Shared Values


What then should a leftist do when confronted with the accusation of socialism. He/She should ignore the accusation and should defend his/her policy recommendations on their merits. That is easy to do, and the rightists have no real defense against it except more name-calling. The defense should invoke basic American values and moral principles. Here is an example in the area of healthcare:


Healthcare is like winter coats for school children. Just as every school child ought to have a winter coat, so everyone in our country ought to have adequate healthcare, and we know that many people are not wealthy enough to provide it for themselves in our current healthcare system. The kind of private health insurance that we have in the United States is not an adequate answer because its cost keeps rising, and its coverage gets worse and worse. 

We know, too, that we cannot provide healthcare for everyone through individual charity.  In health care, there is no equivalent to donating our children’s outgrown coats to Goodwill. We can provide care for everyone only if we use our power as citizens and work through our government to establish a program that recognizes that no one should be denied health care because of an inability to pay. Medicare for All is one way of solving that problem.

Nowhere in this example is socialism mentioned, and the point is that we can promote the policies that we favor without invoking socialism and without discussing its merits. Polls have shown over and over again that while most Americans are wary of socialism, they favor some kind of a national health care system. We can appeal to them on the basis of the values that we all share, and that is how we win.

1 comment:

  1. Thanks for providing these "selling" points! Trying to directly refute charges of "socialism" is a losing strategy. Most people don't really know enough (if anything) about major political philosophies. Much better to emphasize the end results of "good results" than arguing philosophies; very few people know enough the subject!
    HOWEVER, it would be helpful if we could come up with some "hard" data about costs, BUT don't use decade-long figures! It's similar to talking about raising property taxes. If you use the TOTAL costs and divide it by the number of households, it frightens and angers many people. Better to use the increased costs per value per thousands of dollars of value. And also note the costs per year. $200 per year is a sizable but "manageable" cost!

    ReplyDelete