Friday, December 4, 2020

Reducing Racial Inequity in the United States By Making Everyone’s Life Better

 We Must Reduce Racial Inequity in the Distribution of Wealth

Reducing the racial inequity in the distribution of wealth in the United States is an important task. Black people have on average a tiny fraction of the wealth and income of white people, and the difference is due largely to racist policies the history of which is exhaustively detailed by Darity and Mullen[i].  Black people today inherit less than white people do on average, and they have a harder time accumulating wealth during their lives because they are paid less on average than white people at every occupational level. This problem will not solve itself anytime soon. Some kind of action is needed.

Reducing Inequity Through Reparations

We cannot undo the racist policies of the past, but we can reduce their effects in the present by adopting policies designed to make it easier for black people to accumulate wealth. Among those policies are reparations. Reparations are cash payments or services that would be provided for black people as a way of making the wealth accumulation playing field more level in our country.  Reparations would be paid for by the federal government out of tax revenue, and a detailed and reasonable proposal for reparations has been laid out by Darity and Mullen.[ii]

Alternatives to Reparations

The moral case for reparations is unassailable, but politically, the idea has one great weakness, which is that it ignores class differences and consequently leads to the false idea that in order for black people to prosper, white people as a group must give something up.   Talking in terms of reparations leads people to think that in order to level the playing field, all white people must suffer, and of course, that generates opposition. Many white people say, “We didn’t own slaves; we didn’t redline black neighborhoods; we didn’t lynch people or terrorize them. Why should we pay?”

We can approach this problem in a different way if we remember that we live in a time of enormous inequality.  We live in a time in which the wealth gap between the richest white people and the poorest is at least as great as the gap between the median white person and the median black person. Most of the wealth of our society is owned by a small, upper class. In such a society, a graduated, progressive income tax system can guarantee that most of the money to pay for reducing the inequity in the distribution of wealth would come from people who now have substantial wealth and substantial incomes. Most white people would not suffer. In fact, they would benefit.

We can design policies that will have the effect of reducing racial inequity while also reducing class inequity. If we focus on increasing the fairness of our society generally, we will inevitably reduce the gap between black and white people because black people, being overrepresented among the poor and the working class in this country, will benefit disproportionately.

Focusing on fairness in our society in this way meets Ibram Kendi’s definition of an antiracist policy. In his book entitled, How to be an Antiracist[iii], Kendi defines a racist policy as “any measure that produces or sustains racial inequity between racial groups,” and he defines an antiracist policy as “any measure that produces or sustains racial equity between racial groups.[iv]

What then can we do to reduce unfairness in our society and thereby reduce the inequity between black and white people in the distribution of wealth?  A number of things have been proposed, and here are a few of them.

Create Public Trust Funds for All Children

William Darity and his colleagues have proposed that a publicly funded trust fund would be set up for each child that is born in the United States, and the amount in the fund would vary from $500 for children from well-to-do families to $50,000 for children from poor families. Trust funds of this kind would be especially beneficial for black children because black families have on average only about 10% of the wealth that white families have, but the funds would also benefit poor, white children.

Raise the Federal Minimum Wage to $15 or More

An article published by the Economic Policy Institute shows that raising the minimum wage would have a strong effect on the incomes of black workers, and that would increase their ability to save and build wealth. Black workers are overrepresented in minimum wage jobs, and in addition, black people are concentrated in states that have very low minimum wages. So, an increase in the minimum wage would help to reduce the wealth gap between black and white people.

Provide Publicly Supported, Affordable Child Care

The lack of affordable child care is one of our country’s largest barriers to economic equity. Affordable child care would make it possible for many women to go to work or to go to school to improve their skills and thereby increase their incomes. Affordable child care would also make it possible for working women to raise their living standards and to save money thereby increasing their wealth. Thus, affordable child care would benefit working class families of all races, but because black people are more likely than white people to be poor, black people would benefit disproportionately, and the gap between them and white people would be reduced.

Let’s Make Everyone’s Life Better

This article has described a few of the alternatives to reparations for reducing racial inequity in the distribution of wealth in the United States. They are not the only alternatives. Others might include creating a decent, national health care system, providing a reasonable supply of affordable housing or providing a guaranteed, annual income. All of these proposals have the advantage of providing an alternative to the narrative that says that any effort to improve the lot of black people must inevitably worsen the lot of white people.

We can make everyone’s life better!



[i] William A. Darity and A. Kirsten Mullen, From Here to Equality, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 2020

[ii] Darity and Mullen, pp. 256-70.

[iii] Ibram Kendi, How to be an Antiracist, One World, New York, 2019.

[iv] Kendi, p. 18.

No comments:

Post a Comment