What Do Progressive Policies Have to Do with Equality of Opportunity?
In last week’s post, I said that progressive policies should be framed as policies that restore equality of opportunity in our country. Today, I want to explain why talking that way makes sense. What do things like national health care or affordable childcare have to do with equality of opportunity?
Getting Ahead Takes Money
In order to have equality of opportunity, we must not only eliminate barriers like discrimination based on race or gender. We must also give people the opportunity to acquire the resources needed to invest in their futures. In order for people to get ahead, they must be able to save money to pay for training or to invest in a business. If people are living paycheck to paycheck and barely getting by, where will they find the money to pay for tuition or to start a business? If they are working two or three jobs just to pay the rent, where will they find the time to go to school?
Working-Class People Lack the Money
Today, we live in a time where a large and increasing share of the national income goes to a small upper class and to a patrimonial middleclass. For working-class people, wages have not kept up with the cost of living. Many people work two or even three jobs and still live paycheck to paycheck. Saving money to invest in a better future has become harder and harder for many people. Young people who come from families in the upper class or the patrimonial middle class have a much easier time acquiring college degrees and marketable skills. We cannot really say that there is equality of opportunity between the upper classes and the working class when the playing field is so steeply tilted against the latter .
Progressive Policies Have Everything to Do With Equality of Opportunity
In order to make opportunity more equal, we have to make it easier for working class people to save the money that they need to invest in their futures, and that is where the link between progressive policies and equality of opportunity may be found:
- If childcare were more affordable, working-class families would be able to save money to invest in their own and their children’s futures.
- If people did not have to shoulder enormous debts to obtain college degrees or other advanced training, their education would bring a higher return, and they would have more money to invest in their own and their children’s futures.
- If we had a national health insurance system, companies would not have to pay so much for their employees’ health insurance, and in that case, they would be able to pay higher wages which would in turn make it possible for workers to save money to invest in their own and their children’s futures.
- If abortions were legal in all states, working-class families would not have to fear the economic consequences of an unwanted pregnancy. Working-class families could more easily plan for a brighter future.
Fine framing; great ideas. Regretfully, we must all remember that very few of us really believe in those kinds of "equality:. It looks sound on paper, sounds good in discussions. Yet, deep down in our deep, dark, sinful selves, almost always of us WANT TO GET, HAVE AND KEEP EVERY ADVANTAGE WE CAN. Forget about the "principles" of a decent life. We all want the most we can get out of life; and "tough" about all the others! Nicht wahr?
ReplyDeleteI don't think that I agree. I think that our motives are mixed. Yes, we are protective of our interests and our advantages, but not every situation is a zero-sum game. Not every gain for A is a loss for B. In addition, what I see as "my" interests depends on how I define them. Are the interests of my nuclear family the same as my personal interests? What would I sacrifice for my children or my grandchildren? What about the prosperity of my country? Do I identify my interests with those of my country? Soldiers in combat often take big risks for the members of their squad or platoon. Many people have made sacrifices for the groups that they belong to. So, I think that the question is more complex than you suggest.
DeleteThe focus on equality of opportunity is not really altruistic. It is what we use to justify a society with big inequalities of wealth and income.
Delete