Moderate Democrats Have No Vision of the Future
Democrats must support the so-called “left wing” of the
Democratic Party because the members of that wing are the only Democratic
politicians who have ideas about how we can move our country forward. The
party’s leaders have no ideas. Sen. Chuck
Schumer’s campaign web site talks about his positions on various issues
mainly from the point of view of his legislative achievements, which have been
considerable, but he does not prevent a vision for the future.
If we look at the campaign web sites of aspiring
presidential hopefuls Gavin Newsom
and J. B. Pritzker,
we find a similar void of ideas for the future. Newsom says that he is
campaigning to save democracy. Pritzker does not even say that.
Opposition to Trump is not Enough
These politicians are attractive mainly because they are
Democrats opposed to the policies of Pres. Trump. They resist the cruelty of
his policies toward immigrants. They support the extension of the subsidies that make health insurance if
not really affordable at least less ruinously unaffordable than it would be
without the subsidies. They supported Pres. Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act,
and they oppose Pres. Trump’s efforts to gut it and to favor fossil fuels over
renewable energy, but again, they do not present a vision of the future.
However, opposing Pres. Trump and defending past actions,
are not by themselves a vision of the future. These are backward-looking
politicians. They want to preserve the American safety net and Biden’s
environmental policies from Trump’s wrecking ball, but they don’t have anything
to say about today’s problems or about the American future that they would like
to see.
The Party's Left Wing Has Ideas But Does Not Know How to Package Them
In contrast, the campaign
web site of Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is chock full of ideas for the future,
and so is the web site of Bernie Sanders. These politicians are not running on
the past achievements of the party. They are running on a vision of the future,
but as national politicians, they have a major weakness: they describe their
proposals as “socialist.” “Socialist” and “socialism” are words that do not
play well in most parts of the United States. To millions of voters, these
words sound too much like “communist” or “communism.” Democratic socialists
like Sanders or AOC are not communists or really even socialists, but their
vocabulary is a problem.
Repackage the Ideas as in a Realistic Way as Moderate Proposals
What Democrats should do is to take the ideas of the party’s
left wing and package them as moderate ideas, which is what they really are.
They are in no way revolutionary or even radical. To see what I mean, let us examine a few of
those ideas: Medicare for All, Free College and the Green New Deal.
Medicare for All is not a radical idea. On the contrary, it is nothing but the expansion of a successful, existing program to cover more people. Itis precisely the sort of pragmatic, incremental change that has always characterized American politics at its best.
Free post-secondary education at public colleges and universities is also a moderate proposal. In fact, we used to have it. When I attended the University of California in 1958, the tuition was free, and the fees were $140 per semester. Today, the idea of free post-secondary education seems radical, but it is not. It is merely a restoration of the normal, American way to pay for the higher education of our people.
The Green New Deal is a moderate, middle-of-the-road proposal that continues our long-standing policy of
promoting the development of energy sources. We have always believed
that adequate supplies of energy were crucial to the development of our
economy, and the Green New Deal merely redirects our energy policy toward promoting new energy sources that fit
our country’s current needs in a time when the use of fossil fuels is
endangering our country and its economy. Again, that is not radical. It
is precisely the sort of pragmatic, incremental change that has always made our
country successful.
Progressive candidates should promote policies like Medicare
for All, Free Post-secondary education and the Green New Deal and should frame
them as moderate policies . The American far right likes to describe them as "radical" or "socialist," but we should not allow the right to frame the discussion in that way. We should insist on framing
And who is for clean water, clean air, a safe environment? Another moderate policy that needs to be part of the Green New Deal. Promote renewable energy & fight against big oil, big coal and the pollution they cause. Dems have always been the Party of the Environment & that needs to continue with new vigor. More talk about the future of grandkids & their kids!
ReplyDeleteA thoughtful analysis and I tend to agree, but it is hard to see a clear path forward. One faction has the vision, the the other the packaging. Do any national Democratic leaders have the sense and the ability to follow the path you suggest, with a vision of what could constitute true greatness for our country, and improve the economic position for middle America? Mamdani may be an exemplar that it can be practical.
ReplyDelete