Showing posts with label walker. Show all posts
Showing posts with label walker. Show all posts

Friday, February 15, 2013


Governor Walker’s Health Care Plan Hurts Our Economy

Governor Walker Will Not Expand Medicaid

The Post-Crescent reported on February 13, 2013 that Governor Walker has decided against accept federal dollars to expand Medicaid. This is an important decision and will have a big impact on our economy in the Fox Cities.

Governor Walker’s approach, which he calls a “hybrid,” has two components. One is that eligibility for Medicaid (Badgercare) will be tightened. Today, a household is eligible if its income is less than twice the official federal poverty level of $11,490 for individuals and $15,510 for couples. Under the Governor Walker’s approach the eligibility level will be lowered to the federal poverty level, and people whose incomes are above that will have to buy their health insurance through the health insurance exchange that will be set up. Since their incomes are very low, they will presumably be eligible for subsidies under the Affordable Care Act.
Thus, a part of the cost of health insurance for those who are no longer eligible for Medicaid will be shifted to the people themselves. This is indeed Walker’s goal. He said, ““I want to have fewer people in the state who are uninsured, but along with that I’d like to have fewer people in the state who are dependent on government.”

The Effect Depends on the Size of the Subsidy

How this works out in practice will depend on the size of the subsidy. Clearly, a family with an annual income of $31,000 a year does not have a lot of money to spend on health insurance. So, if the subsidy is large enough, this may work well, but there is reason to doubt that the subsidies will be large enough.

On February 15, 2013, the Post-Crescent reported that at an analyst who is no friend of Obamacare said, “To me, this [Walker’s plan] is crazy policy. These exchange plans were never designed for Medicaid-eligible people. They’re designed for middle-class people who can afford deductibles and co-pays.”
The Wisconsin Hospital Association agrees. An article in the Business Journal on line quotes the association’s president Steve Benton: “Hospital executives are concerned that Walker’s plan will result in fewer people with insurance coverage and an increase in uncompensated care.”

Walker’s Plan Will Likely Cost Jobs in the Fox Cities

This is a key point for our economy in the Fox Cities. We have three major hospitals: Appleton Medical Center, St. Elizabeth and Theda Clark, and we have two major health care organizations: Affinity and Thedacare. They are an important part of our economy, and they are among our largest employers. (Thedacare and Affinity Health Care are Appleton’s largest employers after Kimberly-Clark.) Our health care organizations bring money into the Fox Cities because they are regional centers. Their patients include many people from outside the Fox Cities. So, any change in health care policies will have a profound effect on our community.

The income of our hospitals is heavily dependent on Medicare and Medical Assistance (Badgercare). According to data provided by the Wisconsin Hospital Association, 44.1% of revenue of hospitals in our area (Analysis Area 3 of the report) came from Medicare, 10.2% came from Medical Assistance, 40.9% from commercial insurance and 4.7% from all other sources. In other words, 53.3% came from Medicare and Medical Assistance.
Hospitals report what they call “deductions” from gross revenue, and these include the cost of charity care as well as the discounts obtained by large payers like Medicare or insurance companies. According to the report cited above, such “deductions” account for 49.2% of revenue in our area. Discounts provided to Medicare accounted for 27.4% of gross revenue, deductions for Medical assistance 6.8%, discounts to Commercial insurance companies 12.7% and the cost of charity care was 1.3%. All other deductions were 1.1% of revenue.

Walker’s Plan Will Likely Drive Up the Cost of Health Insurance

If the number of people without health insurance increases as WHA expects, the cost of charity care will rise. Some part of the rise will be absorbed by the hospitals, and they will try to offset the rise through cost savings including hiring fewer people. So, Walker’s plan will cost jobs in the Fox Cities.  Another part of the cost will be passed on to the rest of us in the form of higher hospital charges, which will lead to higher health insurance premiums. This will hurt businesses in our community. So, Walker’s plan will hurt business and individuals in the Fox Cities by reducing the number of jobs here and by raising the cost of health insurance. 

Walker’s Plan Fits With the Goal of Reducing the Size of Government

None of this should surprise us.  We have to remember that Governor Walker – an accredited member of the Radical Right – has one overriding goal. He wants to reduce the size of government and lower taxes. He does not care who suffers in the process because in the radical rightist mind, everything will be just hunky-dory in the end if we can just get government “out of the way.” This quasi-religious faith in the power of free enterprise to solve all problems is at the root of his policies. As he said, “I’d like to have fewer people in the state who are dependent on government.”

Wednesday, January 16, 2013


Big Money Trumps Science in the Nation and in Wisconsin


Richard Schoenbohm and I both contributed to this post.

Governor Walker is going to try again to pass the iron ore mining bill that barely failed in the last legislative session, and big money is again promoting the project. 

During the last session,  Wisconsin Manufacturing and Commerce (WMC), the powerful big-business lobby in Madison, alleged it was a myth that the bill would allow mining corporations to dump toxic waste into wetlands.  WMC claimed in a slick release that this environmental concern is “completely false, and ridiculous. Like current law, the bill requires any mining company to go through a permitting process before disturbing any wetland.”1

It is no myth, and the concern is not false.  The Nature Conservancy reports that the bill prevents in-depth scientific evaluation of proposed mines by limiting amount of time the DNR will have to create the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to one year. The report says,

Unlike in Michigan and Minnesota, the bill limits the amount of time the DNR will have to create the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to one year no matter the complexity of the site or the quality of the company’s Environmental Impact Report (EIR).

·   The data gathered and used by the company during the writing of the EIR no longer has to be shared with the DNR, nor is the department consulted in the methods used to gather the data.

·     By removing contested case hearings as well as hearings on the Environmental Impact Statement, there is no third party verification of the company’s data or methodologies.

·        The DNR cannot consider the quality of the information submitted by the company when deeming the application complete. An application could include poor environmental evaluations, but the Department would have no option but to rule the application complete. The Department would not have the time to redo many of these studies in the remaining 360 days. A comprehensive hydrological study takes a minimum of two years.

So how does WMC, a lobby arm of corporate interests, get press time on a scientific issue?  It certainly isn’t its scientific credential.  It is money.  Energy corporations, for example, know that enough expensive propaganda produces policy decisions in their favor despite scientific evidence to the contrary.  How much money?  Here is what Shawn Lawrence Otto reports in Fool Me Twice:  Fighting the Assault on Science in America.

Public data from the Securities and Exchange Commission and charitable organizations’ reports to the IRS show that between 2005 and 2008, Exxon-Mobile gave about $9 million to groups linked to climate change denial, while foundations associated with the private oil giant Koch Industries gave nearly $25 million.  The third major funder was the American Petroleum Institute (API). Between them they created and funded dozens of groups engaged in producing pseudoscience, activism, organizing, media outreach, and lobbying and implemented an all-out propaganda campaign.  But this was a drop in the bucket compared to what they would spend overall.  Between 1999 and 2010, the energy industry spent more than $2 billion fighting climate change legislation, more than $500 million of it from January 2009 to June 2010, or almost $1,900 per day in lobby expenditures for every US senator and representative in Washington – and those numbers don’t include nonreportable expenses like publicity, earned media, rallies, and polling.  They spent an estimated $73 million more on anti-clean-energy ads from January through October 2010, and Koch family foundations gave an overall $48 million to groups engaged in climate change denial between 1997 and 2008.”2
Wisconsin is no different. A lot of big money has been spread around by supporters of the mining project.  Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce spent at least $2 million to influence last year’s recall election, and its members gave more than $1.15 million to candidates in the 2012 election cycle.  Americans for Prosperity, a group founded by the Koch brothers, spent about at least $8 million to influence elections in Wisconsin in 2011-2012.

So, we should not be surprised to learn that Governor Walker is going to try again this year to pass the mining bill. In his “state of the state” speech on January 15, 2013, he said,

One of the best ways we can show the people of Wisconsin that their state government is focused on jobs is to pass a bill that streamlines the process for safe and environmentally sound mining. Start with the legislation that was approved in the Joint Finance Committee last session, include some reasonable modifications, and send me a bill to sign into law early this year.

Maybe you think that Governor Walker’s support of the mining bill is unrelated to the financial support he and other radical rightists in Wisconsin have received, but we are skeptical.
 
1.       Wisconsin Manufacturing and Commerce, Mining Bill 426:  Iron Mining Reform
2.      Shawn Lawrence Otto, Fool Me Twice:  Fighting the Assault on Science in America, p. 198, Rodale, 2011.